Now accepting applications for the next cohort. Book a free consultation
The Scholar Program

The Scholar Program

One-to-one research mentorship for students in grades 8 to 12. Over eight to ten weeks, your child turns a subject they love into an original research paper, with a PhD mentor from one of the world’s top 50 universities beside them at every step.

Book a free consultation
How the program works

Eight to ten weeks, one mentor, and a clear goal at every stage.

Your child meets their mentor online every week, and does 5 or more hours of their own work in between. Here’s what each stage looks like, and who does what. The thinking and the writing always stay your child’s.

Weeks 1–2Find the question

Your child

Reads widely around a topic they already love and narrows it down to one question they can actually answer.

Their mentor

Helps sharpen the focus, points to the papers worth reading, and helps make the question original.

Weeks 3–4Plan the research

Your child

Chooses a method (a survey, a dataset, a model, a close reading) and plans what evidence to collect.

Their mentor

Teaches the method the way it’s used at university, and checks the plan fits the weeks available.

Weeks 5–6Gather and analyze

Your child

Collects the data or sources, runs the analysis, and starts to see what the evidence really says.

Their mentor

Reviews the analysis, asks the questions a real reviewer would, and helps the conclusions follow from the evidence.

Weeks 7–8Write the paper

Your child

Writes the full paper in the structure real journals use: introduction, method, results, discussion.

Their mentor

Gives line-by-line feedback across several drafts, so your child’s writing gets stronger each time.

Weeks 9–10Share the work

Your child

Polishes the final paper and prepares it for a journal, a competition or a symposium.

Their mentor & our team

Help choose a credible venue, prepare the submission, and stay with them through reviewer feedback.

Skills your child builds along the way

  • Asking a sharp questionTurning a big interest into something they can investigate
  • Reading researchFinding, understanding and weighing academic papers
  • Research methodsSurveys, data analysis, modeling or close reading, depending on the field
  • Academic writingStructuring an argument the way university papers do
  • Taking feedbackRevising through drafts, like real researchers do with reviewers
  • Presenting their workExplaining what they found with confidence, in writing and out loud
The process

From idea to finished paper

Over eight to ten weeks, your child's mentor guides them through each stage.

  1. Find a topic

    Narrow a broad interest down to an angle your child cares about.

  2. Ask a strong question

    Shape a focused, original research question.

  3. Review the literature

    Read what others have written on the topic.

  4. Find the gap

    Spot the part of the question still waiting to be explored. That’s where your child’s paper comes in.

  5. Choose a method

    Pick an approach that suits the question and the time available.

  6. Collect and analyze

    Gather the evidence and see what it shows.

  7. Write it up

    Draft the paper in a clear academic structure.

  8. Cite and revise

    Polish the paper through several drafts with mentor feedback.

  9. Submit or present

    Share the finished work through a journal, a competition or a conference.

The heart of it

Finding the right question

Every great paper starts with a clear question, and your child's mentor helps them find one that is focused, original and achievable.

Too broad: A whole subject, like “social media and teenagers.”

Just right: One specific question your child can explore in the time they have, like “Does late-night phone use shorten sleep for 15-year-olds?”

Research from anywhere

Approaches that work for students

Survey and quantitative

Collect data and analyze the numbers.

Qualitative

Interviews, surveys and analysis of texts and media.

Secondary data

Explore existing datasets across many fields.

Systematic review

Bring together and assess existing studies.

Computational or modeling

Build a model, algorithm or argument.

Comparative analysis

Compare cases, texts or policies to find patterns.

Our standards

What makes a strong paper

Focused

A clear question explored in depth.

Original

Built on existing work and adding something new.

Rigorous

Careful, well supported and written to a university-level standard.

Subjects

Subjects we cover

Across STEM, the humanities and the social sciences.

STEM

Data ScienceBiologyMathematicsComputer ScienceMedicinePhysics & AstrophysicsArchitectureNeuroscienceEngineeringChemistry

Humanities & Social Sciences

EconomicsPsychologyBusinessInternational RelationsEnvironmental StudiesGender StudiesSociologyHistoryPhilosophyEducationClassicsLawLinguistics
A student researching and taking notes
Example project

How does sleep shape the teenage brain’s response to addiction?

FieldsNeuroscience · Psychology · Public healthTypeSystematic literature reviewLength8–10 weeks
Interest
Teenagers are famously short on sleep. Does that affect more than how tired they feel?
Question
Does losing sleep during adolescence make teens more vulnerable to addiction, and is the brain’s dopamine reward system the link?
Approach
A systematic review: a structured search of peer-reviewed medical research (PubMed, 2000–2026), selecting studies against clear criteria, then comparing experimental and long-term studies. First, a clear explanation of how sleep works and how the brain’s reward circuit connects to its decision-making centre.
Finding
Across the studies, less sleep (especially later bedtimes and shorter weekend sleep) went hand in hand with more substance use and stronger reward-seeking later on.
Outcome
A paper making the case for healthy sleep as a powerful, underused way to help prevent teen addiction, with ideas for schools and education programs.
Where the work goes

Students in our mentor network have published in respected journals.

Every paper is written to be shared. We help each student choose the right journal, competition or symposium for their field, prepare the submission, and work through reviewer feedback, so they learn how real research gets published.

Journals

  • The Concord Review
  • Journal of Emerging Investigators
  • Columbia Junior Science Journal
  • National High School Journal of Science
  • Stanford Intersect
  • STEM Fellowship Journal
  • Young Scientists Journal
  • Journal of Student Research
  • International Journal of High School Research
  • Journal of High School Science
  • Journal of Innovative Student Research
  • Whitman Journal of Psychology
  • IEEE

Competitions and symposia

  • Regeneron ISEF
  • Junior Science and Humanities Symposium
  • John Locke Institute Essay Prize

Journals and competitions where students in our research mentor network have published or presented their work.

Start with what your child loves.

A no-pressure, 30-minute conversation with one of our enrollment advisors, where we learn from each other: you hear how the program works, and we get to know your child.

Book a free consultation

  • 1We learn about your child’s interests and goals
  • 2We share the program plan and how it supports those goals
  • 3Next steps: mentor match, project idea and timeline